VOMIT UK 12/00
Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 18 March 2000
Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed right of reply. JMF or P2 Lodge UK stands for the hierarchies of the Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the machinations of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are. Almost every institution in the UK is corrupt. While the final blame lies with the Member of Parliament and the Prime Minister, Freemasonry is invariably involved along with the courts, the police and local government.
1. To Joe Schmuckatellijoeschmuck@KILL.SPAMFORD.WALLACE.NOW
Zat your real name Joe? An increased crude oil price does increase the cost of transport and of the goods transported. That is a typical Labour indirect tax. When we talk of benefiting the economies we mean benefiting the Treasury and the fat cats of big business or capitalism. The Treasury funds will be used for nefarious purposes including the re-election of Labour by reducing direct taxation before the General Election.
One day the citizens of the UK will waken up. Interestingly with every day that passes Mohamed Al Fayed’s "wild allegations" have a louder ring of truth and he is seen to be more aware of the endemic corruption in our society than the lumpenproletariat. Mohamed will never get a fair hearing in a court of law and is unlikely ever to get British citizenship
Thank you for all the useful information and references. You are better organised than Millbank! We would hazard a guess that you are connected with MI5 and MI6. Your contribution was well crafted - too well crafted.
We understand your views on Freemasonry. We laboured under the same handicap ouself for twenty years. One reason for publishing VOMIT is to raise awareness of what the Craft stands for. We do not expect to influence brainwashed Masons like you. However we take you up on your point that Freemasonry is good if it can succeed in obtaining housing or employment for ex-soldiers. What makes a person join the army? Unemployment? Homelessness? Sadism? Are you saying that soldier Masons should get precedence over soldier non-Masons?
The fundamental dangers of Freemasonry stem from the secret membership and the preferential treatment given to Masons. This means that we are awash with mediocre officials, MPs, police chiefs, judges, physician superintendents etc. Mediocrity and dishonesty are invariably bedfellows. This country is on a slippery slope when ability is punished and mediocrity rewarded.
Your contribution was courteous and useful until you dealt with the worst two police forces in the country, Thames Valley Police and the Metropolitan Police. That was the finding of the National Audit Office. They had crime detection rates of 20 and 21 per cent. They turned a blind eye to cocaine distribution from the neighbouring site. They are still persecuting us and promoting unlawful development and use of the drug site. Why on earth should we lie about that? Why should you attempt to ridicule the allegations about drugs? The conclusion has to be that you are aware of the drugs operation. We have never heard of Tom Hanks or Turner & Hooch but we did see the eldest member of a well known family of criminals accompanied by two minders collect an estimated 10–Kg of cocaine. Moreover he was one of about ten strangers who visited the site that day. He is currently in prison and will be there for some time. Apparently he changed his cocaine supplier and was arrested. We can name two Detective Sergeants, one from Thames and one from the Met, who aborted an investigation. The powers that be could have carried on with their drug dealings provided they had not concocted charges against us, swindled us out of the drug site and rendered our property unusable. In January 1988 we suffered our first Thames Valley Police frame-up just because we happened to have property next to the drug site and were likely to expose the drug trade and the fact that Barclays Bank Trust Company had swindled us out of the site. We are trying to show people like you how Freemasonry is used. At no time did the brothers offer to discuss matters other than to suggest that we sell our property at a substantial loss or that we joined "the local Freemasons Lodge". We were "the profane". In fact we had been Masonic much longer than our tormentors. They knew that they could do as they pleased. Their behaviour merited very long prison sentences.
For the avoidance of doubt we inform you that we are of the opinion that your contribution to the debate was solely an attempt to conceal the fact that the UK government or the police are importers of cocaine. Drugs generate vast sums of money. The only drugs barons who are prosecuted are the unofficial ones who reduce the street price for cocaine. Tom Hanks and the other man and his dog do not enter the equation any more than Santa Claus does.
1. ***To Barrister Neil Addison, email email@example.com
A London associate of your client, Maurice Kellett, has asked me to point out to you that Kellett’s current persecution follows a well-established Masonic pattern and that you can take action to stop it by contacting the appropriate authorities. The culprits would appear to be his solicitor Hughes, Kellett’s doctor Wylie of West Rainton Surgery, Consultant Cook of Dryburn Hospital and constable Davison at Durham police station. Hughes states that the police will arrest Kellett if he fails to turn up at Durham police station tomorrow.***
Note: This latest police harassment arose when Kellett informed the Northumbria Police Authority that it had to enable an outside force to investigate his complaint of misconduct in public office (a criminal offence) by Chief Constable Strachan. The Police Authorities for Cheshire, Greater Manchester, Leeds, Dorset, Thames Valley, Metropolitan and other constabularies refuse to acknowledge that misconduct in public office is a criminal offence (R v Dytham) and that they must have the complaints of misconduct by their Chief Constables investigated by an outside force. We are currently trying to have Peter Harvey of Dorset and H Springthorpe of Thames Valley indicted for violating the Police and Criminal Evidence Act in that, as Clerks to their Police Authorities, they have not complied with the terms of the Act.
Mr Ebert complains to Stevens that his officers have failed to deal with perjury, fraud and forgery and asks for an appointment with a high-ranking officer. Victims do not normally receive even an acknowledgement from Stevens. He was Condon’s right hand man when the Met came second worst of all police forces in England and Wales. What can we expect from a former Chief Constable of Northumbria?
3. The Masefields, both octogenarians are still being given the run-around primarily by Home Secretary Straw, the Police Complaints Authority and the Charity Commissioners. On humanitarian grounds and in the public interest Attorney General Williams must tackle this corruption and cruel and inhuman treatment without delay. The Masefields have just written to At. Gen. Williams and Meacher of the PCA.
LIVINGSTONE FOR MAYOR
It looks as if Ken has some beggars on horseback organising his campaign. He gives out neither fax number nor email address. His phone number is one of those rip-off numbers costing over 50p to make a donation to his fighting fund. On account of this element of greed we have posted a reduced contribution of £20 - by cheque made payable to "Livingstone for London" - to Livingstone for London, 3 Hanson Street, LONDON W1P 7LZ.
Last week we stated that we felt that the Labour Party and the Post Office would interfere with Ken’s mail. By coincidence we have just had two letters delivered opened. One was from Albert Dryden, H M Prison Garth, Leyland, Lancashire and the other from a London based Human Rights organisation (Phone 0181 801 3690). Dryden informed us that, before the shooting, he had been tormented by the authorities for 4 years. They moved him recently 130 miles from Durham in order to prevent him having regular visits from his friends. He has now spent nearly 9 years behind bars. Straw should be given a taste of prison.
THE HIGH SHERIFF OF DORSET
This High Sheriff is one strange fellow. He is S G Yeatman. He is not on the Electoral Register. He can be contacted only through his Under Sheriffs, L H Parkyn or G S Cox, at fax number 01202 680470. Gerald Coulter’s investigators found that Yeatman lived at Court House, Corfemullen, WIMBORNE, Dorset. Yeatman is a magistrate and a member of the same dinner circuit as Harry Barnes of Lodge 7873 Vindelis. Barnes is the magistrate whom Barry Hunt accuses of being bent. Barnes is also the information technology expert with Dorset County Council. Yeatman is not listed by British Telecom as being either in-directory or ex-directory. Nor is he on the Electoral Register. He may use a mobile phone or another telephone company but the probability is that he is a Mason and is on the Electoral Register and on a BT phone. Parkyn has denied that either he or Yeatman have ever been Freemasons but they could still both be Masons. After all Yeatman’s father who was a much better man than he is was a Mason. His son would be a Lewis. How would Parkyn know if Yeatman was or had been a Mason if he were not a Mason himself?
Perhaps the two brothers, Parkyn and Yeatman, will now provide Mr Coulter with the promised transcript of the discussion he had with them weeks ago. How much longer does Mr Coulter have to wait? Until Yeatman’s term of office is up? Let Yeatman be warned that he will still be liable for damages arising out of the behaviour of his Bournemouth Under Sheriff Kennedy. Kennedy refused initially to let the police question him about the Coulter case. He claimed that he was too ill. His illness would give him time to prepare his story. When Maurice Kellett was too ill to be questioned he was ordered to travel to police HQ in Durham or be arrested. On arrival at the police station he was taken ill and transferred to Dryburn Hospital where an attempt was made to detain him under the Mental Health Act. Kellett has disappeared again. The latest outrages against Kellett commenced when he informed the Northumbria Police Authority that it must refer his complaint to an outside police force.
THE HIGH SHERIFF OF HAMPSHIRE
Kennedy (above) acts also as Under Sheriff of Hampshire to Valentine Powell who appears to have a yellow streak. Gerald Coulter who has Powell’s welfare at heart cannot persuade Powell to even acknowledge receipt of correspondence. Surely the fellow could write to Gerry saying, "I’ll be your sweetheart if you will be mine." Will Valentine be the first High Sheriff to be indicted for misprision of felony and subjected to a citizen’s arrest by a Samurai warrior? Or will he suffer the fate of David Dolton the solicitor who allegedly committed suicide.
GEOFFREY SCRIVEN AND THE TIMES
Gary Slapper has an article in the Times Law Report on 14 March in which he mentions Mr Scriven’s (Fax 0161 428 1159) case. Slapper is director of the law programme at the Open University and a proper little apologist for the judiciary. Here is Mr Scriven’s reply via Frances Gibb, the Times Legal Editor.
*** I hope you will allow me "the right to reply" to Gary Slapper, "Case Notes, Tuesday 14 March 2000, re Section 42, Vexatious Litigant.
Gary Slapper completely misses the point about Section 42. It is an unfair abuse of power.
Section 42 is instigated by H M Attorney General, (H M Government’s unelected, Senior Law Officer – in the present Executive), and in reality, protects the unelected Cabinet Minister who, as Lord Chancellor, is also Head of the Judiciary, the Judiciary themselves, their Alma Mater the Bar Council and/or the Law Society.
The Section 42 will, of course, be heard by Lord Justices, who will, of course, rule in their own cause and that of their colleagues.
An appeal will, of course, be heard by Lord Justices, who will be "secretly briefed" by the Head of Civil Appeals, "The Master of the Rolls", to prejudice the appellant and rule in their own cause and that of their colleagues.
Everything about "the Section 42 Gagging" is contrary to natural justice and, of course, the ECHR.
The only "fair way" to hold a Section 42 hearing is before a jury. These Rt Honourable Gentlemen are terrified by the thought!
Yours sincerely, Geoffrey Scriven, President of the Litigants in Person Society. ***
Comment: Litigants in person dispense with lawyers and counsel because they have found them treacherous leeches. When a judge fails to act impartially he commits a serious criminal offence. Prime Minister Blair is finally responsible for the Irvine’s failure to discipline judges. The police also have a role in investigating and prosecuting the judges. Unhappily, the Blairs, husband and wife, are part of the legal system. They learned their trade in the chambers of the Lord Chancellor who sees himself as a 21st century Cardinal Wolsely.
Mr Scriven has also written to Commissioner Stevens, the Official Receiver, Trade and Industry Secretary Stephen Byers, MP, Detective Timothy Harvey of the Met Police Fraud Squad et alios. At one time it looked as if Harvey would tackle serious crime committed by judges, counsel, solicitors, police and court staff. There is now a suggestion that Harvey has been reined in presumably on the instructions of Home Secretary Straw as directed by Blair or Irvine.
MORE CHILTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL CORRUPTION
We had telephone calls on Tuesday from a highly qualified man (pseudonym Klaxon). He explained that Prescott and Chiltern District Council planners were too stupid to be corrupt. Since when was stupidity a bar to corruption and greed? Our caller asked about the drug site and mentioned another septic tank a few hundred metres away from here on the banks of the river Misbourne. Nonfeasance by Viscount Mills of the Environment Agency again!
Klaxon was concerned about developments at the Vache Estate. You may recall the attempt by three American drug addicts with organised crime connections to develop the Vache as a sex/drug clinic and how they scampered when Chancellor Kohl learned that their cover had been blown. The Vache belonged to British Coal. The USA crooks had bid around 6 million pounds for the Vache. When the crooks left UK the Vache was sold to local people for peanuts. Klaxon tells us that the Vache is owned by two Russians who got planning permission to build 13 homes after signing a strict binding agreement with Chiltern District Council to, inter alia, allow free access to the Captain Cook memorial statue erected in the grounds of the Vache. The Russians have put up a fence and a notice to prevent members of the public getting access to the memorial. To avoid further confrontation the Russians are apparently negotiating the sale of the Cook monument to New Zealand.
The theory behind this is that the Russians are paranoid about the possibility of some member of the Russian Mafia taking a pot shot at them. If the report is correct the Exchequer was swindled out of around 5 million pounds.
Klaxon also informed us that Scottish Hydroelectric PLC and not Scottish Power amalgamated with the crooks of Southern Electric.
CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING, PO Box 54, Cambridge CB5 8BB. Fax 01223 327042.
Ph 01223 327634 (Organiser - Suzon Forscey-Moore, American Law Researcher)
POW TRUST, (A registered benevolent and social welfare charity) 295a Queenstown Road,
London SW8 3NP. Tel.0171 720 9767 Fax 0171 498 0477 (Gen.Secy. Peter Sainsbury).
TRY "PUNCH" AND BUY "PUNCH"(£1.50 fortnightly) Punch Letters,100 Brompton Road,
LONDON SW3 1ER.firstname.lastname@example.org Fax 0171 225 6766.
Lloyd's world-wide swindleshttp://www.truthaboutlloyds.com email email@example.com
Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU
Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel 01494 871204. Fax 01494 870031 firstname.lastname@example.org Return to the archive