VOMIT UK 21/01
Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 26 May 2001
Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed right of reply. JMF or P2 Lodge UK stands for the hierarchies of the Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the machinations of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are. Almost every institution in the UK is corrupt. While the final blame lies with the Member of Parliament and the Prime Minister, Freemasonry is invariably involved along with the courts, the police and local government. Everything we publish is aimed at the detection and prevention of crime especially in the public sector. We act in the public interest.
Following a number of European Court decisions the people, including senior judges, accused of swindling investors were cleared of wrongdoing. During the past week US investigators have still been looking into the swindles. They were to interview former chairmen of Lloyds, Murray Lawrence, David Coleridge and Sir David Rowland on behalf of the US Attorney General at the US embassy in London. Another former chairman, Max Taylor, called on the Americans to abandon their investigation because a High Court judgement cleared Lloyd’s of fraud.
Comment: The frauds owed their successes to the High Court.
Web sites with Hans Kochler's UN report on them.
Copy of report from The Sunday Herald headed UN claims Lockerbie trial rigged.
See also Paul Foot’s special report (Lockerbie – The Flight From Justice) published in Private Eye May/June 2001.
Look! We have no interest in Stichbury’s bedroom acrobatics or her morals provided she does not proclaim publicly that her force has the highest moral standards. Since that is a subjective judgement we are entitled to question her moral standards to assist the understanding of why she has allowed Masons to rule the roost in Dorset. It might also explain why she, a police officer without administrative experience, was promoted to Chief Constable and forced to rely upon George Pothecary to run her force when he is not making love to the barmaid at the caravan site. Why has she ignored the complaints of John and Blanda Masefield, Michael Croley, Barry Hunt, Gerald Coulter, Robert Owen and probably many other victims of Freemasonry? Who does she think she is?
When Jane arrived is Dorset we had a report that she was a West Country lass returning to her roots and that she was married to a senior Metropolitan Police officer named Evans. She was born in North London. She was not married to Evans. We have no evidence that her relationship with her present husband and his relationship with Stichbury caused the breakdown of two marriages. Not too much attention should be paid to the fact that she was living under the brush with her present husband before they married. She changed her name back to her maiden name (Stichbury). She has kept that name in her new marriage. There is nothing wrong in that especially since her husband is much older than she is. He was a senior officer in the Metropolitan Police and probably a Mason. Will she marry Pothecary in secret when his barmaid has tired of him and she of her old man? Can you imagine a caravan in some remote field rocking as Jane and George, the Chief Constable and her deputy, dance the Tennessee Waltz?
Perhaps our Metropolitan Police friends will tell us about the interaction between the army and police cavalry on ceremonial occasions. One report asserts that Jane is a beggar on horseback riding to Hell encouraged by Masonic councillors and magistrates including “Dirty Harry Barnes, chairman of the bench and provincial grand master”. There is mention of people beholden to Masons such as the leader of Dorset County Council Trevor Jones and two MPs Oliver Letwin and Ian Bruce who have apparently left victims to their fates. The magisterial wives of Masons come in for stick. In particular County Councillor P D L Gaussen is a member of Lodge 622 “St Cuthberga Wimborne”. His wife Elaine is a magistrate. The reporter asks, “When will the people of Dorset wake up?” We ask when will the people in the UK waken up.
Donald Clifford v Ministry of Defence and Metropolitan Police.
So far Sir John Stevens has not responded to the complaint that he authorised the unlawful eviction of Mr Clifford from his home using the Ministry of Defence police acting without lawful authority.
There was a hearing on Friday 18 May 2001 at the notorious Central London County Court before Judge Butter. The Treasury Solicitors attempted to strike out Mr Clifford’s claim and prevent Dr A Adoko acting for Mr Clifford. The trial will take place in October before another judge because Judge Butter is retiring. However the Treasury Solicitors will get their way at the end of the day.
These repeated challenges to Dr Adoko are an insult. He is a qualified barrister (voluntarily disbarred) who felt a need to act as a solicitor dealing directly with his clients and not through solicitors. Judge Butter has allowed him to represent Mr Clifford in accordance with the Human Rights Act.
Comment: Few people will believe this report. There must be thousands who are suffering the same sort of victimisation without realising that Freemasonry is responsible. This will give the victims some comfort. We believe absolutely the Ryder story having suffered the same sort of abuse from the Metropolitan, Thames Valley and Lothians and Peebles Police and from Westminster City, Chiltern District and West Lothian County councils. Scurrilous reports are planted with the Press. MI5 creates a file, which makes you a threat to national security. “D” notices are applied if you succeed in exposing the crooks. The latest weapon against whistleblowers is shoot-to-kill.
<<< On four of the five occasions Derek Ryder of Plymouth spoke on the BBC phone-in programme about Freemasonry, he made no mention of his own abuse by the Dirty Brigade. Three years ago the programme host, who soon afterwards was taken off the programme, pressed him to talk of the hate campaign against his family.
Mr Ryder explained the physical and mental abuse meted out to his three children. Certain teachers promoted the abuse. The predominantly Masonic Plymouth Police force regularly harassed him. Councillors and council employees had their snouts in the same trough. When Mr Ryder tried to put a stop to the abuse he met a wall of silence or Masonic diversion. He bombarded Council Leader John Ingham who stated insultingly that he would do nothing. In the hypersensitive way of Masons Ingham did not once make reference to Freemasonry which was the root cause of the trouble.
Mr Ryder named names in the programme with the result that the crooks were shuffled off into the backwaters of Plymouth’s criminal syndicates.
A few weeks after the programme Mary Kendall and her deputy Truscott, the heads of the primary school, who had presided over the Ryder children's first nightmare years, took early retirement. Shortly after that Wyatt, the deputy head of the junior school, resigned. He had caused serious hardship for young James Ryder. The Dirty Brigade will attack the whole family of anyone who falls foul of it. The Chief Superintendent of Plymouth police followed the three sadistic teachers into the wilderness. Then Council leader John Ingham "shocked the city and even many of his colleagues " (according to the Plymouth Evening Herald) by making the sudden and surprise announcement that he would be "stepping down" more or less straight away.
Mr Ryder claims no credit for getting rid of the vermin. Nor do their resignations give him any satisfaction. He expected the culprits to be removed as soon as they were identified publicly and replaced by other members of the Dirty Brigade. These evil people had done irreparable damage to his children.
Four days after he and his wife Kathleen had withdrawn their children from their schools, they heard their elder daughter Bridget (then 13 years' old) sobbing in her bedroom. Bridget, in the weeks before she was withdrawn from school, had been trying to work out how to kill herself. The tears were tears of relief. Freemasonry is the work of the Devil. >>>
Mr and Mrs Michael Croley and their 7-year-old son Danny were moving into a flat allocated to them by Weymouth and Portland Borough Council. On Friday 20th January 1995 Philip Lock of Phil Lock Removals , 119a, High Street , Wyke Regis , Weymouth delivered a carpet to the empty flat. Lock and Dennis Squib, an employee of Courts Furnishers Weymouth, dislodged the doorframe as they manoeuvred the carpet around the stairway. Lock told Mrs Croley to tell the council that the decorators had damaged the door. Mrs Croley had to leave the flat unsecured as she collected her son from school. She contacted the Citizens Advice Bureau. (CAB)
The CAB advised Mrs Croley to contact the Manager of Courts and to obtain details of Lock’s Public Liability Insurance. Mrs Croley reported the matter to the council, which arranged for D Hoad of Weyport Services, Weymouth to call. Hoad kicked the frame back into place. He did not effect any other repair.
Next morning Mr Croley contacted Mr Edward Harris the manager of Courts Furnishers. On Harris’ advice Mr Croley telephoned Lock to ask for details of his insurers. Lock did not respond to messages left on his answering machine. Harris then gave Mr Croley Lock’s home address and told him to call on Lock. When Mr Croley called on Lock he was threatened with a baseball bat and told to “Fuck off”. The Croleys went back to Harris who told them to get a quotation for the repair of the door. The following day Mr Croley was arrested and charged with assaulting Lock.
When the quotation was delivered to Harris he said that his head office would not authorise payment because it was too high. Harris was playing games. The liability was Lock’s.
On the 8th February 1995 at 10 p.m. Mr Croley was arrested for attempting to obtain money by deception. At 11-p.m. police officer David Tubb returned with a W P C and asked Mrs Croley to accompany them to the station. She had to leave her son with a neighbour whom she did not know. The police did not tell her why she had to go. Since it was so late she assumed that Mr Croley required corroboration. Tubb made it clear that she had to go to the police station. That was totally unacceptable police behaviour especially in view of the trauma inflicted on the young boy and the aspersions cast upon the Croleys as they entered a new neighbourhood. As Mrs Croley closed the door behind her Tubb arrested her for attempting to obtain money by deception. He clearly wanted her out of the house before she could summon help.
Mrs Croley arrived at the police station in a state of shock. The female police psychopath who accompanied Tubb told Mrs Croley that she would be put in a cell with a tramp they had picked up earlier. Mrs Croley refused to join the tramp and was told that she would have to sit on the bench until PCs Tubb and Wiles had finished questioning Mr Croley.
At midnight it was Mrs Croley’s turn to be ridiculed and threatened by crooked policemen. They refused to believe that the door had not been repaired and stated that Mr Hoad had repaired it. The bent cops were told to go and check for themselves that the door had not been repaired. The cowardly bullies continued to torment a lonely frightened lady. They said that they had seen a worksheet proving that the repair had been done. The Croleys were released on bail at 1 a.m. That night the Croley family was n a state of disbelief. Their young son’s eyes were red and puffed up with crying. The parents did not sleep a wink. They still have nightmares years later.
The police could obtain no evidence of Lock’s attack with the baseball bat. They charged the Croleys with attempting to obtain money by deception. Sergeant Mutan who must have known that the Croleys were being framed, ordered them not to go near the council office to inspect the worksheet for the alleged repair of the door. They went to the council office and saw an itemised list of repairs done by Westport Services costing £19.00. The repairs listed were “refix loose doorframe including drill, plug and screw". A quick inspection of the door would have shown that the bill was false. The Croleys immediately visited Weymouth Police Station and insisted upon a visit by Inspector Paul Gillett and his scenes of crime officer for proof that the repair work had not been done. The policemen attended and took photographs. The Croleys believed that that was the end of the affair. Gillett must be sick or a covert Mason. The case continued.
Next week we hope to explain how the Dirty Brigade was behind this Dorset police corruption.
Norman Scarth, CV 5049, H M Prison, Marshgate, Doncaster DN5 8UX
Mr Scarth will appear for sentencing at Sheffield Crown Court on Friday 8 June 2001. If the judge really wants to punish him and save the Brotherhood and the courts a lot of time Norman should be sentenced to time already served in prison and told to go away and behave himself.
Letter dated 21 May 2001 from John and Blanda Masefield (Tel. 01308 485412
Fax. 01308 485729 e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org )
To: The Office of the Freedom of Information Commission, Whytecliffe House, Water Lane,
Wilmslow SK9 5AF
<<< (att’n Mrs France)
Dear Madam, Freedom of Information Act 2000
We requested information in respect of a document – the Engineer Negus survey report – issued by (a) West Dorset District Council and (b) lodged in Weymouth County Court in 1985.
(a) Information was refused, requiring a Court Order.
(b) County Court could not help; we forwarded copy of FoI Act 2000, Ch.36, pt.1 s1 to the Court Manager for re-consideration.
We now understand, pursuant to our further enquiries, that the said Act is not in force.
Your comment/advice will be appreciated
Yours faithfully, (J. & B.Masefield) cc Lord Chancellor >>>
Comment: We would have thought that the Freedom of Information Act 2000 became law in 2000. In our introduction we state that there is no law. This would appear to be another example.
*** Arthur Oaks has secured legal aid for his application to the Court of appeal for permission to appeal. His counsel has been granted an adjournment until July by Mummery LJ and Nourse.
The Masons are applying to have his wife bankrupted after trying to get their greedy hands on some properties. She too is seeking permission to appeal a number of orders.
This was opposed by the counsel for Mr Oaks trustee, establishment stooge David Barnard of 33 Bedford Row WC1, but this again was rejected by the court and Mrs Oaks was also granted an adjournment.
Barnard also tried to mislead the court as to the nature of Mr Oaks Legal Funding Certificate by claiming that there was no limitation on it. These lies were exposed in the court.
Legal Aid is at the moment limited to obtaining counsel's opinion on merits. One can however only speculate at what that opinion may be. ***
Local Government Ombudsmen Osmotherley and White must be barred from holding public office. We have no space to report their latest shenanigans. A Judaeo/Masonic pair.
Published by J M Todd, B.Sc., Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road,
Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU.