VOMIT UK 21/01
Victims Of
Masonic Ill-Treatment 26 May 2001
Anyone
criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed right of
reply. JMF or P2 Lodge UK stands for
the hierarchies of the Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the
machinations of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are. Almost every institution in the UK is
corrupt. While the final blame lies
with the Member of Parliament and the Prime Minister, Freemasonry is invariably
involved along with the courts, the police and local government. Everything we publish is aimed at the
detection and prevention of crime especially in the public sector. We act in the public interest.
Following
a number of European Court decisions the people, including senior judges,
accused of swindling investors were cleared of wrongdoing. During the past week US investigators have
still been looking into the swindles.
They were to interview former chairmen of Lloyds, Murray Lawrence, David
Coleridge and Sir David Rowland on behalf of the US Attorney General at the US
embassy in London. Another former
chairman, Max Taylor, called on the Americans to abandon their investigation
because a High Court judgement cleared Lloyd’s of fraud.
Comment: The frauds owed their successes to the High Court.
Web sites with Hans Kochler's UN report
on them.
http://i-p-o.org/lockerbie-report.htm
http://squat.net/koekoeroe/telewokwok/archief/kochler.htm
Copy of report from The Sunday Herald
headed UN claims Lockerbie trial rigged.
See also Paul Foot’s special report
(Lockerbie – The Flight From Justice) published in Private Eye May/June 2001.
Look! We have no interest in Stichbury’s bedroom
acrobatics or her morals provided she does not proclaim publicly that her force
has the highest moral standards. Since
that is a subjective judgement we are entitled to question her moral standards
to assist the understanding of why she has allowed Masons to rule the roost in
Dorset. It might also explain why
she, a police officer without administrative experience, was promoted to Chief
Constable and forced to rely upon George Pothecary to run her force when he is
not making love to the barmaid at the caravan site. Why has she ignored the complaints of John and Blanda Masefield,
Michael Croley, Barry Hunt, Gerald Coulter, Robert Owen and probably many other
victims of Freemasonry? Who does she
think she is?
When
Jane arrived is Dorset we had a report that she was a West Country lass
returning to her roots and that she was married to a senior Metropolitan Police
officer named Evans. She was born in
North London. She was not married to
Evans. We have no evidence that her
relationship with her present husband and his relationship with Stichbury
caused the breakdown of two marriages.
Not too much attention should be paid to the fact that she was living
under the brush with her present husband before they married. She changed her name back to her maiden name
(Stichbury). She has kept that name in
her new marriage. There is nothing
wrong in that especially since her husband is much older than she is. He was a senior officer in the
Metropolitan Police and probably a Mason.
Will she marry Pothecary in secret when his barmaid has tired of him and
she of her old man? Can you imagine a
caravan in some remote field rocking as Jane and George, the Chief Constable
and her deputy, dance the Tennessee Waltz?
Perhaps
our Metropolitan Police friends will tell us about the interaction between the
army and police cavalry on ceremonial occasions. One report asserts that Jane is a beggar on horseback riding to
Hell encouraged by Masonic councillors and magistrates including “Dirty Harry
Barnes, chairman of the bench and provincial grand master”. There is mention of people beholden to
Masons such as the leader of Dorset County Council Trevor Jones and two MPs
Oliver Letwin and Ian Bruce who have apparently left victims to their
fates. The magisterial wives of Masons
come in for stick. In particular
County Councillor P D L Gaussen is a member of Lodge 622 “St Cuthberga
Wimborne”. His wife Elaine is a
magistrate. The reporter asks, “When
will the people of Dorset wake up?”
We ask when will the people in the UK waken up.
Donald Clifford v Ministry of Defence and Metropolitan
Police.
So far Sir John Stevens has not
responded to the complaint that he authorised the unlawful eviction of Mr
Clifford from his home using the Ministry of Defence police acting without
lawful authority.
There was a hearing on Friday 18 May
2001 at the notorious Central London County Court before Judge Butter. The Treasury Solicitors attempted to strike
out Mr Clifford’s claim and prevent Dr A Adoko acting for Mr Clifford. The trial will take place in October
before another judge because Judge Butter is retiring. However the Treasury Solicitors will get
their way at the end of the day.
These repeated challenges to Dr
Adoko are an insult. He is a qualified
barrister (voluntarily disbarred) who felt a need to act as a solicitor dealing
directly with his clients and not through solicitors. Judge Butter has allowed him to represent Mr Clifford in
accordance with the Human Rights Act.
Comment: Few people will believe this report. There must be thousands who are suffering the same sort of
victimisation without realising that Freemasonry is responsible. This will give the victims some comfort. We believe absolutely the Ryder story having
suffered the same sort of abuse from the Metropolitan, Thames Valley and
Lothians and Peebles Police and from Westminster City, Chiltern District and
West Lothian County councils.
Scurrilous reports are planted with the Press. MI5 creates a file, which makes you a threat to national
security. “D” notices are applied if
you succeed in exposing the crooks.
The latest weapon against whistleblowers is shoot-to-kill.
<<< On
four of the five occasions Derek Ryder of Plymouth spoke on the BBC phone-in
programme about Freemasonry, he made no mention of his own abuse by the Dirty
Brigade. Three years ago the programme
host, who soon afterwards was taken off the programme, pressed him to talk of
the hate campaign against his family.
Mr
Ryder explained the physical and mental abuse meted out to his three
children. Certain teachers promoted
the abuse. The predominantly Masonic
Plymouth Police force regularly harassed him.
Councillors and council employees had their snouts in the same
trough. When Mr Ryder tried to put a
stop to the abuse he met a wall of silence or Masonic diversion. He bombarded Council Leader John Ingham who
stated insultingly that he would do nothing.
In the hypersensitive way of Masons Ingham did not once make reference
to Freemasonry which was the root cause of the trouble.
Mr
Ryder named names in the programme with the result that the crooks were
shuffled off into the backwaters of Plymouth’s criminal syndicates.
A
few weeks after the programme Mary Kendall and her deputy Truscott, the heads
of the primary school, who had presided over the Ryder children's first
nightmare years, took early retirement.
Shortly after that Wyatt, the deputy head of the junior school,
resigned. He had caused serious
hardship for young James Ryder. The
Dirty Brigade will attack the whole family of anyone who falls foul of it. The Chief Superintendent of Plymouth police
followed the three sadistic teachers into the wilderness. Then Council leader John Ingham
"shocked the city and even many of his colleagues " (according to the
Plymouth Evening Herald) by making the sudden and surprise announcement that he
would be "stepping down" more or less straight away.
Mr
Ryder claims no credit for getting rid of the vermin. Nor do their resignations give him any satisfaction. He expected the culprits to be removed as
soon as they were identified publicly and replaced by other members of the
Dirty Brigade. These evil people had
done irreparable damage to his children.
Four
days after he and his wife Kathleen had withdrawn their children from their
schools, they heard their elder daughter Bridget (then 13 years' old) sobbing
in her bedroom. Bridget, in the weeks
before she was withdrawn from school, had been trying to work out how to kill
herself. The tears were tears of
relief. Freemasonry is the work of the
Devil. >>>
Mr
and Mrs Michael Croley and their 7-year-old son Danny were moving into a flat
allocated to them by Weymouth and Portland Borough Council. On Friday 20th January 1995
Philip Lock of Phil Lock Removals , 119a, High Street , Wyke Regis , Weymouth
delivered a carpet to the empty flat.
Lock and Dennis Squib, an employee of Courts Furnishers Weymouth,
dislodged the doorframe as they manoeuvred the carpet around the stairway. Lock told Mrs Croley to tell the council
that the decorators had damaged the door.
Mrs Croley had to leave the flat unsecured as she collected her son from
school. She contacted the Citizens
Advice Bureau. (CAB)
The
CAB advised Mrs Croley to contact the Manager of Courts and to obtain details
of Lock’s Public Liability Insurance.
Mrs Croley reported the matter to the council, which arranged for D Hoad
of Weyport Services, Weymouth to call.
Hoad kicked the frame back into place.
He did not effect any other repair.
Next
morning Mr Croley contacted Mr Edward Harris the manager of Courts
Furnishers. On Harris’ advice Mr
Croley telephoned Lock to ask for details of his insurers. Lock did not respond to messages left on
his answering machine. Harris then
gave Mr Croley Lock’s home address and told him to call on Lock. When Mr Croley called on Lock he was
threatened with a baseball bat and told to “Fuck off”. The Croleys went back to Harris who told
them to get a quotation for the repair of the door. The following day Mr Croley was arrested and charged with
assaulting Lock.
When
the quotation was delivered to Harris he said that his head office would not
authorise payment because it was too high.
Harris was playing games. The
liability was Lock’s.
On
the 8th February 1995 at 10 p.m. Mr Croley was arrested for
attempting to obtain money by deception.
At 11-p.m. police officer David Tubb returned with a W P C and asked Mrs
Croley to accompany them to the station.
She had to leave her son with a neighbour whom she did not know. The police did not tell her why she had to
go. Since it was so late she assumed
that Mr Croley required corroboration.
Tubb made it clear that she had to go to the police station. That was totally unacceptable police
behaviour especially in view of the trauma inflicted on the young boy and the
aspersions cast upon the Croleys as they entered a new neighbourhood. As Mrs Croley closed the door behind her
Tubb arrested her for attempting to obtain money by deception. He clearly wanted her out of the house
before she could summon help.
Mrs
Croley arrived at the police station in a state of shock. The female police psychopath who
accompanied Tubb told Mrs Croley that she would be put in a cell with a tramp
they had picked up earlier. Mrs Croley
refused to join the tramp and was told that she would have to sit on the bench
until PCs Tubb and Wiles had finished questioning Mr Croley.
At
midnight it was Mrs Croley’s turn to be ridiculed and threatened by crooked
policemen. They refused to believe
that the door had not been repaired and stated that Mr Hoad had repaired it. The bent cops were told to go and check for
themselves that the door had not been repaired. The cowardly bullies continued to torment a lonely frightened
lady. They said that they had seen a
worksheet proving that the repair had been done. The Croleys were released on bail at 1 a.m. That night the Croley family was n a state
of disbelief. Their young son’s eyes
were red and puffed up with crying.
The parents did not sleep a wink.
They still have nightmares years later.
The
police could obtain no evidence of Lock’s attack with the baseball bat. They charged the Croleys with attempting to
obtain money by deception. Sergeant
Mutan who must have known that the Croleys were being framed, ordered them not
to go near the council office to inspect the worksheet for the alleged repair
of the door. They went to the council
office and saw an itemised list of repairs done by Westport Services costing
£19.00. The repairs listed were “refix
loose doorframe including drill, plug and screw". A quick inspection of the door would have
shown that the bill was false. The
Croleys immediately visited Weymouth Police Station and insisted upon a visit
by Inspector Paul Gillett and his scenes of crime officer for proof that the
repair work had not been done. The
policemen attended and took photographs.
The Croleys believed that that was the end of the affair. Gillett must be sick or a covert
Mason. The case continued.
Next
week we hope to explain how the Dirty Brigade was behind this Dorset police
corruption.
Norman Scarth, CV 5049,
H M Prison, Marshgate, Doncaster DN5 8UX
Mr
Scarth will appear for sentencing at Sheffield Crown Court on Friday 8 June
2001. If the judge really wants to
punish him and save the Brotherhood and the courts a lot of time Norman should
be sentenced to time already served in prison and told to go away and behave
himself.
Letter dated 21 May 2001 from John and
Blanda Masefield (Tel. 01308 485412
Fax. 01308 485729 e-mail
blandamase@talk21.com )
To:
The Office of the Freedom of Information Commission, Whytecliffe House,
Water Lane,
Wilmslow SK9 5AF
<<< (att’n Mrs France)
Dear Madam, Freedom of Information Act 2000
We
requested information in respect of a document – the Engineer Negus survey
report – issued by (a) West Dorset District Council and (b) lodged in Weymouth
County Court in 1985.
(a) Information
was refused, requiring a Court Order.
(b)
County Court could
not help; we forwarded copy of FoI Act 2000, Ch.36, pt.1 s1 to the Court
Manager for re-consideration.
We
now understand, pursuant to our further enquiries, that the said Act is not in
force.
Your comment/advice will be appreciated
Yours faithfully, (J. & B.Masefield) cc Lord Chancellor >>>
Comment: We would have thought that the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 became law in
2000. In our introduction we state that
there is no law. This would appear to
be another example.
***
Arthur Oaks has secured legal aid for his application to the Court of appeal
for permission to appeal. His counsel
has been granted an adjournment until July by Mummery LJ and Nourse.
The
Masons are applying to have his wife bankrupted after trying to get their
greedy hands on some properties. She
too is seeking permission to appeal a number of orders.
This
was opposed by the counsel for Mr Oaks trustee, establishment stooge David
Barnard of 33 Bedford Row WC1, but this again was rejected by the court and Mrs
Oaks was also granted an adjournment.
Barnard
also tried to mislead the court as to the nature of Mr Oaks Legal Funding
Certificate by claiming that there was no limitation on it. These lies were
exposed in the court.
Legal
Aid is at the moment limited to obtaining counsel's opinion on merits. One can
however only speculate at what that opinion may be. ***
Local Government Ombudsmen Osmotherley and White must be barred from holding public office. We have no space to report their latest shenanigans. A Judaeo/Masonic pair.
Published by J M Todd, B.Sc., Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road,
Chalfont
St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU.
email vomituk@my-deja.com