VOMIT UK 33/00
Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 12 August 2000
Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed right of reply. JMF or P2 Lodge UK stands for the hierarchies of the Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the machinations of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are. Almost every institution in the UK is corrupt. While the final blame lies with the Member of Parliament and the Prime Minister, Freemasonry is invariably involved along with the courts, the police and local government. Everything we publish is aimed at the detection and prevention of crime especially in the public sector. We act in the public interest.
Please don't send us recorded delivery letters. These are more likely to arrive opened or go missing. Anyway we cannot collect them or involve third parties in their collection.
Please don't ask us for the names of Masons. Where there are irrational violations in civil or criminal law and the violations go unpunished we know that Freemasonry is involved. The Masonic hierarchy will rule supreme until the ordinary decent Masons quit the Brotherhood and let the major players do their own dirty work. All Masons are not evil and all evil people are not Masons. Ordinary crooks in thrall to Masons are the most dangerous criminals of all. They are compromised and have to obey Masonic orders. In return they have immunity from prosecution.
Please don't think that you are our only correspondents and that we file all your documents religiously. As often as we can, we clear the decks and dump all letters in boxes. Nothing is thrown away. Nothing is accessible after about one week unless we employ someone to search elsewhere. Surely you do not expect us to read detailed reports on cases. Victims usually know the salient features. There is no need to dot the Is and cross the Ts. Be as truthful as you can be.
MICHAEL CROWLEY AND STICHBURY MASONS
We are still trying to locate Mr Crowley. We publish this report because something has to be done about the Dorset Masons. If there are any errors we will publish corrections later. Please note that Gerald Coulter and Robert Owen, on the invitation of Dorset police, were interviewed on Tuesday last about the Masons in the councils and their failure to comply with a Statutory Instrument requiring declaration of their membership of the secret society. When Mr Coulter was asked if he had any more information on Masons he replied "Look at next week's VOMIT" and then told the three police officers about the Royal Arch Masons. If VOMIT does not appear this week you may take it that Thames Valley Police have been asked again to close us down using a police marksman if need be.
Bailiffs called on Mr Coulter on Thursday 10 August at about 1630 hours. One of the Mafiosi, Guido Hilton of Nathans, was overheard making the false statement that Mr Coulter had been abusive to him. Guido the Weedo was asked to leave the premises but hung about trying to provoke Mr Coulter and then said that he was calling the police.
REPORT *** You have reported how Mike was complaining and lobbying against Andrew Jackson and his firm of bent solicitors, Turners. We now have details of how a Dorset policeman framed him. The Davenports are a Masonic family of four Dorset police brothers of whom at least three are Masons. This in effect means that the odd man out if he is an odd man out has the benefit of Masonic skulduggery when he needs help with a frame-up. Mike Croley was wrongly charged and convicted of harassment. The policeman involved was M Davenport whose three brothers, SG, WR and GA Davenport are Royal Arch Masons in Royal Arch Lodge 1863 Durnovarian. GA Davenport is also a member of Lodge 8726 Durnovarian. The frame-up was a form of gag on Mr Croley to prevent him exercising his fundamental right of freedom of speech to expose a solicitor named Jackson, a partner with Turners of Poole. Senior partners in Turners belong to the dirty brigade. One of the Davenports tried to eject Barry Hunt on the police Open Day for handing out leaflets reporting Barry's frame-up by PC Culley and magistrate Harry Barnes the most senior Mason in Dorset. Mr Hunt told Davenport to "piss off. The magistrate who accepted the lies and perjury and then convicted Mr Croley of harassment was J M Brett, JP, another Royal Arch Mason of Lodge 1168 Benevolence, Sherborne. The judge who made an ex-parte order evicting Mr and Mrs Croley and their 9-year-old son from their home was I Askham of Lodge 7966 Wareham. The senior Crown Prosecution Service solicitor is Roger Hall, a member of one of the Branksome lodges.
Dorset Police are still out of control and the Masons have Chief Constable Stichbury and the CPS in their pockets. *** ENDS
Comment: We find that the inference that Dorset is uniquely corrupt is symptomatic of the lack of understanding of the Masonic cancer, which permeates the commanding heights of authority. It relies upon people like the scoundrels referred to in the foregoing report to do its dirty work. We are asked if MI5, the Lord Chancellor's department, the Land Registry, the Charity Commission, the Inspectorate of Constabulary, judges, MPs, Ordnance Survey, Ombudsmen et cetera are influenced by Freemasonry. Freemasonry homogenous. It even crosses establishment boundaries and national frontiers. For example the Lord Chancellor (alleged to be a member of the Scottish Grand Lodge) or one of the Masons on his staff might pick up the telephone and make a call to a Provincial Grand Master or to the Most Worshipful Master of a village Lodge and ask him to destroy someone who has criticised Irvine's choice of wallpaper. Or he might phone MI5 and ask it to use its dirty tricks against another innocent member of the public who has displeased him by referring to his seduction of Donald Dewar's wife and his cheating at Glasgow University.
The Masonic poison runs through every authority in the land and is the basis of all overt corruption that goes unpunished.
LIPS BULLETIN NUMBER 4
Drafted by Geoffrey Scriven, President of Litigants In Person Society (LIPS). Phone 0161 428 0764 and Fax 0161 428 1159.
*** On 1 August Hendon Magistrates ordered committal papers to be lodged for hearing on 11 September 2000.
The private summons alleges fraud by Miss Y Venvil, Trustee in bogus bankruptcy of Gedaljahu Ebert who is now also a victim of a Section 42 "Gagging Order", to prevent his whistle blowing on the Judicial Mafia.
This national scandal is controlled by the Judicial Mafia "Board of Godfathers", the Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief Justice, Master of the Rolls, Vice Chancellor using Lower Court judges as "their personal Gestapo." - quote, RCJ.CT56, 31-07-00, M J Neuberger when refusing to stand down; "….litigants cannot select the Judge." He totally ignores that for over two years he has almost exclusively reserved Mr Ebert to himself!
The Metropolitan Police Fraud Squad have been forced to, "go through the motions," - promising to investigate, allocating officers, (e.g. DCI Timothy Harvey, DI John Hester etc.), issuing Crime Nos. (e.g. 8403435199/dated 15-12-99; SX 2417525/00C/dated 06-07-00) etc. All the Judicial Mafia corruption is for pecuniary gain by the Judicial Mafia and associates.
These cases involve notorious criminals. (in the above quoted cases, DJ Eric Jones, HHJ Maddox, Sir Richard Scott ex V-C, MJ Neuberger, MJ Laddie, LJ Aldous, LJ Walker etc.)
As the Judicial Mafia are exposed, "Godfathers" Bingham, Woolf and Scott, have all recently "worked their tickets," to other posts and places, to get away from their years of criminal wrongdoing - secretly briefing Appeal Court Judges to pervert the course of Justice; concealing documents and evidence to pervert the course of Justice.
"The Bailey" with "clean Judge" and jury awaits these criminals!
The Charge - High Treason
Nobody is above the law.
Signed Geoffrey H Scriven. ***
Comment: Mr Scriven is transparently honest. He has been exposing the named judges for years. Attempts have been made to imprison him for "scandalising the court" and then for having failed to adhere to an undertaking, given under duress, not to scandalise the court. The cowardly judges have so far failed to commence libel proceedings presumably because Mr Scriven would expose them before a jury.
We dislike the over-the-top presentation of the above report. However if victims are not permitted to let off steam in this way they will let off bombs. We also deplore Mr Scriven's failure to mention the root cause of all judicial corruption, Freemasonry. We understand that Mr Ebert's last appearance before Neuberger was pure pantomime. For example Neuberger was screaming at Mr Ebert and threatening to call the tipstaff and have him arrested if he did not sit down and shut up. Mr Ebert approached the bench with his wrists held forth for handcuffs and told Neuberger to go ahead. Another lady named Lilian Rayne told Neuberger that he was the strangest judge she had ever come across.
Stop Press: On Thursday 10 August 2000 Mr and Mrs Ebert were arrested by the Metropolitan Police who are supposed to be investigating the corruption of the legal process giving rise to the Ebert bankruptcy. In their absence Miss Y Venvil against whom Mr Ebert has commenced criminal proceedings emptied the Ebert home of all its contents presumably to seize Mr Ebert's evidence.
THAMES VALLEY POLICE
The police allege that the raid on Slough magistrates' court was to free two villains charged with burglary. If you believe that you will believe anything.
The policeman who led the two gangs of seven raiding here on 21 and 22 August last year, Detective Constable Blankenback, has been promoted to Sergeant in charge of policing High Wycombe town centre. Blankenback was acting under the instructions of senior officers but that does not excuse his behaviour. His two raids took place three and four days after the shoot to kill raid of Constable Williams and the forced entry into our premises following criminal activity and perjury by employees of Southern Electric.
The people in Buckinghamshire are, on the whole, cap doffing sycophants. We told how the chairman of the County Council named Ross, reported that he did not have a fax machine in order to avoid receiving copies of VOMIT. Then there was Robinson who is also a member of the police authority. He claimed that he had correspondence to which he had replied. When we asked him for details of the police authority he told us that we already had these. Robinson must be a manky Mason. Several councillors prefer to feign ignorance of the corruption in their council. As soon as they refuse communications from members of the public they should resign. Another councillor with a huge expense allowance is Mrs Aston (Fax 01494 562138) Budnall Farm, Haddenham, AYLESBURY, Bucks HP17 8TS. We noticed that her machine had been used to fax us sheets from the VOMIT publications. We made her confirm in writing that she was responsible. While we have a right to inform her particularly about council corruption the stupid wench is guilty of harassment in faxing us our own material.
We still have not heard from Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary, Sir David O'Dowd. Crime is on the increase apparently unchecked while people like O'Dowd sit on their Masonic high horses and refuse to communicate with the "profane." O'Dowd will be another fat cat who will receive a peerage and a massive retirement pension for not rocking the boat.
Nor have we heard from the Metropolitan Commissioner Stevens to whom we reported Westminster City Council's chief executive Rogers for failure to deal with corruption. Do members of Westminster City Council Masonic Lodge visit Lodge Manor St James? Did you know that former Commissioner Imbert who knew that the Guildford Four were innocent at the time of the Balcombe Street siege was made Lord Imbert by Blair?
The Italians refer to Blair as "the scrounger" for his freebie holidays. For his French freebie Blair returns the favour by having people like Justice Sir David Keene appointed to the High Court and now to the Court of Appeal. What is the trade off for Romano Prodi who has 100 policemen guarding Blair in Italy? Something stinks! When will the members of the Labour Party waken up? When will the public realise that Masonic crony appointments and corruption in the highest offices are dragging this country down? What does the Labour rank and file make of Blair's trip to Italy with his family, the family's friends and his mother-in-law? We are expected to believe that everybody except the Prime Minister had to pay his or her fare. Last year it was nanny Roz, her mother and her brother who travelled with the Blairs.
The beggars on horseback squander billions, which could be put to much better use. The estimated cost to the taxpayer of Blair's flight to Italy was £40,000. That woman who was sacked from the Dome management team received a severance payment of £100,000. Turkey is to get £200 million while it gives sanctuary to Asil Nadir, the man Jack Straw vowed to punish. Nearly every government minister has been profligate with refurbishment of premises or junketing trips abroad. They are like alcoholics let loose in a brewery. Blair fixes the minimum wage with no curbs on the maximum wage. Even after 3 years of Labour we still have rip off Britain with supermarket and car prices the highest in the world.
This government is off the rails. There is only one reason for privatisation or the private/public finance initiative. Connections between government ministers and businesses are made. Rewards can be channelled to politicians or their friends in cash or in kind
REPORT FROM TERENCE EWING
*** Enclosed is a further transcript of the recent Bishop s. 42 case. Peter Hayward is in contact. Mr Bishop has been stitched up by the Masons like Mr Ebert, and again his cases were heard by the arch Masonic crook Neuberger.
Mr Bishop is applying for leave to appeal out of time, but we have suggested that he applies back to the Divisional Court to set aside his order as it was made in his absence. That bastard Laws was one of the judges, and he was disqualified under Pinochet as he appears for the Attorney General against Ken Johnson on s. 42 whilst at the bar.
I also enclose the judgement in John Drewe which Geoffrey will tell you about. This was another stitch up by bent old bill Volpe in league with the Masons and M16. Hopefully Mr Drewe will now take his case to Strasbourg to overturn arch Masons and members of the judicial Mafia Latham and Rivlen at Southwark CC. ***
Comment: Mr Ewing is exceedingly well versed in the Law. He has burned many gallons of midnight oil helping victims of the British legal system.
With his report he sent copies of two judgements running to 14 pages each. We were not present in court to hear the arguments. We could have foretold the judgements. We trust that Mr Ewing will do a synopsis the next time and keep it within one A4 sheet using 12 pt type.
Stop Press - On 21 July LJ Latham, MJ Hidden and HHJ Zucker QC refused John Drewe's appeal against conviction and sentence of 6 year's imprisonment. Mr Drewe has maintained since the start that he was framed by our security services (earlier copies of VOMIT). We learned on 9 August that Mr Drewe was sent to an open prison on the Isle of Wight and has now been released.
THE CARDINAL RIDES AGAIN
Published by J M Todd-Misbourne Farmhouse-Amersham Road-Chalfont St Giles-Bucks. HP8 4RU
Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel 01494 871204. Fax 01494 870031
Letter dated 9 August to Lord Justice Morritt from Mr A Ebert 23 Cranbourne Gardens, London NW11 0HS. (ANNEXATION TO VOMIT 33)
Re: Action A 3/2000/25018
I have been shown a judgement made by His Lordship on 11 July 2000, and was asked to confirm the statements and finding made in the afore-mentioned judgement.
His Lordship made unsupported and inaccurate statements in the judgement.
1) In Paragraph 2, His Lordship refers to a judgement against me made on 6 June 1995, in excess of £50,000.
Did His Lordship have the judgement in the file and/or has His Lordship seen the judgement?
a) I have never received any judgement pronounced in court against me.
b) Can His Lordship please specify the exact amount of the judgement to which His Lordship refers, and was this a final judgement.
2) In the same paragraph (paragraph 2), His Lordship stated that a judgement against me had been assigned to Ralph Wolff.
a) Does His Lordship have any evidence of any assignment to anybody of any judgement debt owed by me.
b) Can you please provide me with the evidence relied on at the time His Lordship made his findings.
c) Does His Lordship have any evidence to support the statement in the assignment, that Ralph Wolff paid any money to Midland Bank, as on the face of the assignment? I have evidence to the contrary.
3) In paragraph 4, His Lordship made a finding that a trustee was appointed.
a) Does His Lordship have any evidence that the trustee was legally and validly appointed? I have documents to prove to the contrary.
b) Does His Lordship have the notes to the meeting lodged in court, as is required in accordance to rule 6.95 IA 1986?
c) Does His Lordship have any evidence of any court decision that the appointment is valid and legal.
His Lordship is fully aware that His Lordship's Judgement, and the findings in the judgement will be and has been used as evidence, claiming it to be findings and re-judicata. As such, His Lordship is duty bound and has an obligation to make sure that the findings and statements made by His Lordship are without a doubt true and all the evidence in support can be and has been provided and exists, and that the findings are not merely on assumptions.
In my submission His Lordship's findings do not correspond with the true facts. I, therefore, request that His Lordship investigate the matter, and what evidence the court had and has in front of it. If I am correct, and the court did not have and does not have all the evidence, and what should have been lodged in court was not, and the findings are incorrect, then His Lordship has to review and correct the findings/judgement.
Failing to comply with my request is an act of preventing the due course of justice, and is assisting professional organised crime, for them to be able to rely on His Lordship's findings as support and to cover up a fraud.
To make it absolutely clear:
1) Midland Bank did not have any debt owed neither by Europride Ltd, in Liquidation, nor by Mr. Ebert. (This was confirmed by The Master of the Rolls)
2) Midland did not have and do not have any judgement to assign. The assignment is a sham with the intentions to defraud.
3) The bankruptcy order was made on a fictional debt supported by perjury affidavit and the court did not have the jurisdiction to make the bankruptcy order. (IA 1986)
4) The possession order on the family home was obtained by fraud.
Are you prepared to be a party and directly involved to a miscarriage of justice and fraud?
I hope His Lordship wll comply with my request for clarification, as Lord Justice Woolf MR responded and clarified unclear statements in the judgernent given by him on 31 March 1999.
Awaiting your urgent response
Yours Sincerely, Signed G Ebert.
Note: On 10 August 2000 the Metropolitan Police arrested Mr Ebert and his wife. While they were under arrest their home was emptied by Yvonne Venvil the trustee in bakruptcy against whom Mr Ebert commenced criminal proceedings. It is believed that this was an attempt to seize evidence against Venvil and Morritt. Morritt has just been appointed Vice Chancellor in succession to another of the same, Sir Richard Scott.Return to the archive